Aug
8
2011
Doug Wilson writes: “In and through the sacraments, God winnows, divides, nourishes, establishes, and gloriously saves. He did this throughout the course of the OT narrative, and He is doing it now.” [1]
I agree with this statement entirely, except that the New Covenant body is entirely “priestly.” The Table is not primary education, but secondary. It is not the preaching of the gospel to the unconverted, but the memorial of it by the converted.
Continue reading
6 comments | tags: Baptism, Communion, Covenant Theology, Doug Wilson | posted in Bible Matrix, Biblical Theology, Quotes
Aug
2
2011
Doug Wilson writes:
“Why do baptists not understand the covenant? The answer is not what many paedobaptists want to hear — the baptists do not understand it because paedobaptists do not understand it” (To a Thousand Generations, p. 95).
In context, Pastor Wilson’s argument here seems to be that if the church is suffering from nominalism, paedobaptism is not to blame.
Continue reading
Comments Off | tags: Baptism, Covenant Theology, Deuteronomy, Doug Wilson | posted in Bible Matrix, Biblical Theology
Jul
30
2011
“If the Federal Vision got baptism right, they would be demonstrating the biblical dominion pattern in every individual’s life.”
Matt Caslow posted some thinking man’s questions concerning Bully’s broadband brand of credobaptism. Matt, I hope these answers help you understand my assertions. Happy to discuss further. I’ll soon be posting a page at the top of the blog with baptism links.
Continue reading
16 comments | tags: Acts, Baptism, Communion, Doug Wilson, Federal Vision | posted in Bible Matrix, Biblical Theology
Jul
25
2011
Doug Wilson writes:
“As far as the Jews were concerned, the Bible teaches that because they were born into an Israelite family, circumcised in the covenant on the eighth day, they were attached to the tree. This attachment was an objective historical fact. But the sin and hypocrisy of many of them was also an objective fact, and the Lord of the Orchard consequently removed their branches, and grafted in other branches. Now the interesting thing here is that Paul turns and warns the Gentiles who had been grafted in against the very same sin committed by their fruitful predecessors” (To a Thousand Generations, p. 89).
Pastor Wilson writes that Israel is still the tree, but that the ascended Christ is Israel. I dispute the assumption that “natural branches” are still possible. The tree is now supernatural.
Continue reading
2 comments | tags: Baptism, Circumcision, Doug Wilson, High Priest, Peter Leithart | posted in Biblical Theology
Jul
20
2011
Grace Agenda Conference Trailer from Canon Wired on Vimeo.
This looks like good medicine. Guess I will have to settle for the MP3s again. You know Doug and Mark. Ben preaches at Doug’s church and his messages are simple yet profound. They really stick with you. I’ve read Nate Wilson but not heard him speak. I hear he’s also very good.
Continue reading
Comments Off | tags: Doug Wilson, Grace, Mark Driscoll, Masculinity | posted in Christian Life
Jul
17
2011
.
From The Power in Persuasion: An Interview with N.D. Wilson and Doug Wilson
How has our postmodern society affected the way we think about rhetoric and persuasion?
Postmodernism is really nothing new. It is just ancient sophistry in a rented tux. Lots of mouth and no muscle. But what we say in the book most directly collides with both modernism and its wee post when we discuss the nature of proof. Skip papa modernism’s crusade for humanistic omniscience and you skip postmodernism’s adolescent daddy issues.
Continue reading
Comments Off | tags: Doug Wilson, Evangelism, postmodernism | posted in Apologetics, Quotes
Jul
16
2011
More on baptism. Jane Dunsworth has posted some well-thought-out strikes and I figure it’s worth posting my parries here.
Continue reading
Comments Off | tags: Baptism, Covenant Theology, Doug Wilson, Federal Vision | posted in Biblical Theology, Christian Life
Jul
13
2011
Does Christ’s exhortation to His disciples in John 15 to remain in Him allow for the possibility of unregenerate New Covenant members?
Doug Wilson writes:
“For many Christians, [John 15:1-6] is a ‘problem passage.’ We want Christ to use a different figure. We want Him to be the Marble Box, with us as the individual marbles. When we are saved, we are put into the Marble Box, and we had better watch it, or we might find ourselves taken out of the Marble Box, losing our salvation. Or, if we know that salvation is not a possession of ours, which we could lose, we want the Marble Box to have a great big lock on it, and to be full of elect, non-loseable marbles” (To a Thousand Generations, p. 84).
We agree that the truly elect cannot be lost. We also agree that not all of the Old Covenant people were truly elect. But can we import this “not all Israel are Israel” into the New Covenant order?
Continue reading
3 comments | tags: Baptism, Doug Wilson, Feasts, John Bunyan, Paul, Romans, Tabernacles | posted in Biblical Theology, The Last Days
Jun
28
2011
or Holy Smoke
Doug Wilson writes:
“The debate in the early church was not whether the Jews should stop circumcising their sons; it was whether the Gentiles had to start. The decision of the Jerusalem council was not that individual Gentiles did not have to be circumcised. If circumcision had been required of them, it would have obligated them to live as Jews under the Mosaic law — which included the circumcision of all subsequent generations. Circumcision was not being waived for individual Gentiles; circumcision was being waived for Gentiles and their seed. So the Christian church did not insist that Gentiles circumcise their infants — not because they were infants, but because they were Gentile infants” (To a Thousand Generations, pp. 68-69).
Since there is no ex-plicit proof of infant baptism, Pastor Wilson’s self-stated, continuing goal here is to find im-plicit proof. My goal in the following is to show that not only do circumcision and baptism not correspond, but also that the solution to the dispute in this passage he refers to is given in the passage, leaving no room for an im-plicit reference to infant baptism.
Continue reading
16 comments | tags: AD70, Baptism, Circumcision, Covenant Theology, Culture, Doug Wilson, Federal Vision, Genesis, James, James Jordan, John, Literary Structure, Noah, Peter Leithart, Revelation | posted in Bible Matrix, Biblical Theology, Ethics, The Last Days
Jun
24
2011
Doug Wilson writes:
“This objection misses the point that Peter is making. The issue with Cornelius and his household was not whether they were old enough to receive water baptism, but whether they were Jewish enough. If this household had contained an infant, the members of the ‘circumcision’ who were there would not have objected to baptism on the grounds of infancy, but rather because the infant was Gentile and uncircumcised” (To a Thousand Generations, p. 55).
Certainly, the issue was whether Gentiles should be baptized, but it was never a pitting of circumcision against baptism. They understood that circumcision was a beginning and baptism was a new beginning. Circumcision was replaced not by baptism but by the death of Christ, which united Jew and Gentile. Jesus tore down that wall, and paedobaptism unwittingly puts it up again. Circumcision marked out flesh as a plot of Land. That is entirely done with. Spirit water overflows all human barriers, it wipes out every distinction with a new one – Repentance and Faith.
Continue reading
9 comments | tags: Baptism, Circumcision, Doug Wilson, Federal Vision, Film, Peter | posted in Biblical Theology, Quotes, The Last Days